These days, there's been more arguing in the group about whether privacy coins/mixing coins are considered "original sins" or not. It seems everyone wants a one-sentence answer, but in reality, things are not so clean. To put it simply, on-chain privacy is not a switch; it's more like a gray zone: you can want to avoid being watched by the entire network, but compliance won't automatically overlook you just because you're an "ordinary user." My expectation is quite simple: privacy tools will become increasingly difficult to use, access will be more strictly restricted, and occasional misjudgments will even be normal... I see simplicity as a trap. Anyway, when I look at projects, I first check how they handle the aspect of being auditable/provable. Don't just shout about privacy and freedom while relying on tokenomics to paint a rosy picture. When I encounter this, I will still politely call it out.