After I mute the group, I actually feel a bit more refreshed.

Less of that "Just set up a bridge and it’s already gone wrong, better withdraw" bombardment,
My mind can return to the basic issue: on-chain privacy.
Ordinary people shouldn't expect "being invisible," more like "reducing the level of being casually watched by passersby";
If you really hit the compliance boundary, on-chain traces should still be there,
In plain terms, you're just changing the way you're exposed.

Recently, cross-chain bridges have been hacked, and oracle price feeds have been acting up,
Everyone is starting to default to "wait for confirmation first,"
I think this consensus is quite realistic:
When distrust rises, privacy tools can't save your risk exposure.
My expectation is: verify what can be verified (contracts, permissions, fund paths),
For what can't be verified, treat it as a higher-cost black box,
Reduce your positions and time exposure a bit, and go with that for now.