Recently, I’ve been tracking a set of global energy data and found some interesting changes in the natural gas production landscape in 2023, especially in the rankings of natural gas production by country.



Global natural gas production in 2023 edged up to 4.05 trillion cubic meters, but the growth rate was actually quite steady. The United States increased by 4.2%, continuing to hold the top spot worldwide, with production reaching 1.35 trillion cubic meters—accounting for nearly one quarter of global output. Behind this figure is the past decade’s US shale gas revolution (hydraulic fracturing technology), which added more than 350 billion cubic meters of capacity. Even more interesting is that the United States is not only the largest producer today, but also the world’s largest liquefied natural gas exporter; in 2023, its export volume reached 434 million cubic meters.

By contrast, Russia saw production fall by 5.2% to 58.64 billion cubic meters in 2023. On the surface, Russia still remains the world’s second-largest producer and exporter, but in reality, Europe is gradually moving away from reliance on Russian gas. In 2023, the share of Russian gas in EU supplies was only 14%, down sharply from 45% in 2021. The decline is striking. Russia has already shifted its focus eastward, with China and India becoming new major buyers. This reflects a deep adjustment in the global energy trade pattern.

From the demand side, global natural gas demand grew by only 0.5% in 2023, but the growth was highly concentrated—demand rose in China, North America, Africa, and the Middle East, while Europe’s demand fell by 6.9%, hitting a new low since 1994. As the world’s largest liquefied natural gas importer, China saw demand grow by 7.2%, reflecting the momentum of its post-pandemic economic recovery. The reason for Europe’s demand decline is the rapid development of renewable energy and nuclear power, which directly squeezes out demand for natural gas.

Looking at the top ten rankings for natural gas production by country, besides the two giants—the United States and Russia—Iran ranks third (25.17 billion cubic meters), China fourth (23.43 billion cubic meters), Canada fifth (19.03 billion cubic meters), and Qatar sixth (18.1 billion cubic meters). What this ranking really reflects is different countries’ energy strategies: some are expanding production capacity (both China and Iran have expansion plans), some are adjusting export directions (Russia is turning toward the east), and some are accelerating the construction of liquefied natural gas infrastructure (Qatar, Australia).

It is worth noting that the United States’ LNG exports in the first seven months of this year already reached 442 million cubic meters, a year-on-year increase of 3.3%. This figure indicates that international demand remains strong, and that, thanks to technological advantages and its geographic position, the United States firmly holds global energy pricing power. It is expected that by 2050, the United States will continue to maintain its status as a net exporter of oil and natural gas.

Another trend is that countries are reexamining energy security. Qatar plans to increase the capacity of its North Field gas fields to 142 million tons per year by 2030. Although Australia faces the challenge of some gas fields nearing depletion, the government has rolled out the “Australia Future Natural Gas Strategy” to ensure energy security. After Russia exited, Norway became a major supplier to Europe, accounting for 30.3% of EU supplies in 2023.

Overall, the global natural gas production landscape by country is being reshaped. This is not only the result of geopolitics, but also reflects strategic adjustments made by countries amid the energy transition era. In the short term, natural gas remains a key transitional energy source, but in the long run, whoever can lock in supply chains within this decade will hold the power to shape the energy narrative.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments