Lately, I've been really into AI Agents handling on-chain interactions, automatically placing orders, running strategies—basically outsourcing the "itchy" fingers to robots... But when it comes to critical steps, I still think someone needs to have the final say: authorization/signature, one mistake there and everything's wrong. No matter how smart the Agent is, it can't prevent you from making a single wrong click that grants unlimited permissions; and for cross-chain operations, contract upgrades, unfamiliar protocol interactions—when you encounter a bunch of parameters you don't understand, at least you can pause and ask yourself, "What exactly am I buying?" Then there's stop-loss and withdrawal—Agents can execute according to rules, but if the market suddenly freaks out or liquidity dries up, it might endure even more than I would. Thinking about it, the recent criticism of the "compound yield" from staking and shared security setups—it's pretty much the same: the more automation, the more peace of mind, but layer upon layer, when something goes wrong, you need to know which layer to cut the power from first. Anyway, I've set a simple rule for myself: the Agent handles the work, I handle the brakes, and I write down my reasons for entering—otherwise, I might chase the market so much I start doubting my life.