Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, an interesting debate has been heating up in the crypto community about quantum computers and their potential impact on Bitcoin. And here arises an intriguing paradox — experts are almost evenly split on how real this threat is.
Charles Edwards from Capriole Investments recently issued one of the most alarming warnings. In his opinion, this is the first true existential risk to Bitcoin that people are simply ignoring. Edwards noted that over several market cycles, he remained calm even during the worst events — price crashes, exchange closures, major hacks, and even FTX. But this time, he feels differently. He compared the situation to using outdated military tactics against modern warfare, stating that without adaptation, Bitcoin simply won't stand a chance. In his view, the most frightening aspect is not just the threat itself, but also the industry's indifference and lack of urgency toward it.
Similar concerns are expressed by CryptoQuant founder Ki Yong Joo. He suggests that the network may need serious changes, possibly even freezing old addresses as part of an upgrade resistant to quantum attacks. However, he acknowledges the complexity of such a step, as the crypto community often cannot agree on protocol updates.
But not everyone in the industry shares this level of concern. Jameson Lopp from Casa believes that quantum computers do not pose an immediate threat. In his opinion, the technology is still too far from being able to break Bitcoin's cryptography. He recommends continuing to monitor developments but considers the fear of an imminent danger premature.
Grayscale also takes a more optimistic stance, noting that in the coming years, quantum computers are unlikely to have a significant impact on crypto markets. Michael Saylor also downplays this threat, citing that most cybersecurity experts believe that a serious quantum threat remains more than a decade away.
This creates an interesting situation where Charles Edwards and his allies see an urgent need for action, while others believe there’s no need to rush. Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in the middle — it’s worth preparing, but without panic.