Recently, I've been hearing everyone talk about AI Agents automatically handling on-chain tasks, and I still feel a bit uneasy about it... I don't oppose automation that can be done automatically, but when it comes to signing, authorization limits, whether the contract address has changed, or where the routing goes, it still requires human oversight. Otherwise, a string of "unlimited authorizations" + fake front-end, no matter how smart the Agent is, will still confirm for you. And for things like cross-chain transfers and lending liquidations, if the parameters go off course, it can lead to a chain reaction of disasters. Stopping first and investigating is more reassuring than dealing with it after the fact.

Moreover, I also resonate with the current complaints about on-chain data tools and tagging systems being laggy or even misleading: just because a tag looks clean doesn't mean the wallet is truly "white." Frankly, it's more like a reference, not a talisman. My colleague asked me yesterday, "Since there are tags, why do we still need to look at transactions?" I can only say: tags give you direction, but transaction details are the evidence. Anyway, my habit is: if something abnormal happens, withdraw first, then slowly ask why.