These days, there's been more arguing in the group about privacy coins and mixing coins—whether they count as "original sins." Honestly, what everyone fears isn't the technology itself, but where the compliance boundaries are drawn. For regular users, I think the expectations shouldn't be too naive: on-chain isn't anonymous, it's "pseudo-anonymous." As long as you're involved with centralized deposits and withdrawals, many times your transactions are traceable, freezeable, and queryable.



My current view on privacy is more like "expose less, don't fight head-on." Don't grant permissions you don't need to, and if you can remove routing, do so. Don't jump into strange pools all at once; if you really need to use privacy tools, you first have to think clearly: can you explain the source and destination later? Anyway, after being caught in traps multiple times, I have one principle: confirm first before acting, avoid digging your own pits... Arguments in the group are fine, just don't get carried away.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments