Recently, on-chain people keep saying they see "coincidental transfers" and start imagining inside information. Actually, many things are not so mysterious when broken down: if the same address sends money to three different people within a few minutes, it might just be batch payments with multi-signature; if A transfers to B, and B immediately transfers to C, it could be a bridge/aggregator running a process, and when the path is extended, it looks like a relay race. To put it simply, don’t focus on a single hop; you should see the previous and next transactions as one "route": where the funds entered, where they changed hands, and finally landed in what kind of stablecoin or exchange hot wallet—this is more like one thing. Recently, it’s normal to see complaints about miner/validator income, MEV, and fair ordering; retail investors always feel they are behind, making it hard not to get frustrated... I regret not the outcome, but that I only saw the word "coincidence" and immediately got nervous back then. That’s it for now, time for another coffee refill.