Recently, people have been asking me again where the returns from LST/re-staking really come from… I understand it like this: treat the “staking certificate” as a ticket, then go back into the line to receive other tickets. The baseline part is provided by the chain; what comes after that is more about the protocol pushing incentives, or people being willing to spend money to buy your “security/liquidity.” In plain terms, it’s attention plus subsidies propping it up. When the subsidies stop, it goes back to being ordinary—sometimes even more awkward than “ordinary.”



The risks are also pretty straightforward: one layer is that if the contract/escrow runs into trouble, the certificate turns into worthless paper; another layer is that re-staking borrows the same security multiple times—if something really goes wrong, it can trigger a chain reaction. And on top of that, when liquidity isn’t sufficient, you can’t even run away. Recently, memes and celebrity endorsements shouting have started grabbing attention again, and when new folks get excited, they go pick up the last baton… At a time like this, if you stack “multi-layer gains” in the form of leverage again, I can only say—you’re quite brave. In any case, I will make sure I’ve worked out the exit path clearly before taking action.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin