Lately, looking at DAO proposals feels a bit like building with blocks: on the surface, it's about "giving the community tokens / driving growth," but the real power dynamics are who can propose, who can modify, and who can delay until everyone loses patience. Many proposals make the incentives look quite appealing, but when you look closely at voting weights, delegation portals, and execution thresholds, the power structure is revealed—basically, it's not about "to vote or not," but about "who is more likely to be heard."

Recently, hardware wallets have been out of stock, and phishing links are everywhere. I'm actually more cautious now: whenever a proposal includes "signing/binding/claiming airdrops on this site," my first reaction is to close the page... A few days ago, I even considered uninstalling several wallet plugins to avoid accidentally clicking on something. But thinking about it, uninstalling isn't a solution; it's better to honestly map out dependencies: which contracts have admin rights, who holds emergency pause powers, and how tokens flow. Once I finish drawing it out, I feel more at ease—so for now, that's how I'll proceed.