These days I’ve seen people talk about re-staking and shared security again, to put it simply, it’s just selling the same principal “promise” multiple times, and the returns stack up to be very tempting, but the risks don’t just disappear out of nowhere, it’s just a different packaging. Last week I almost got tempted to add another layer, but I thought: once the underlying layer has issues, the chain reaction of explosions is higher than I imagined, don’t mistake “composable” for “mindless stacking.”



Now they’re stacking AI Agents and automated trading systems, constantly talking about “fully automated on-chain interactions,” sounds very convenient, but who’s responsible for the security boundary? Contract permissions, delegation, upgrades, price feeds… if one link isn’t thought through, the returns are just used to buy anxiety. Anyway, I only dare to do what I understand, something that, if it breaks, I won’t lose sleep over. Just survive first.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments