Just took another chart and reviewed last week's pool: The AMM curve looks smooth, but in reality, every time the price deviates, you're being hit in the opposite direction of "buy low, sell high." To put it plainly, impermanent loss isn't some mysticism; it's you silently paying the cost by treating volatility as an expense. When the market suddenly moves, the fees are simply not enough to fill the gaps. Market making is definitely not a get-rich-quick scheme.



Recently, I've been discussing interest rate cut expectations, how the US dollar index and risk assets rise and fall together. My feeling is: once correlation kicks in, volatility seems to push in waves, making the pool more prone to being pulled back and forth. Actually, now I care more about timing and emotions—setting a range I can handle, and pulling out if it exceeds that. Anyway, I don't want to be fooled again by the phrase "steadily earning fees." That's all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments