Modularization, to put it simply, doesn't feel very "revolutionary" to most end users. You should just click confirm or confirm again; it's just that the backend separates settlement, data, and execution, which theoretically makes it cheaper, faster, and easier to assemble new chains. But the real change in experience is in the risk profile: previously, you worried about a chain going down; now it might be "this layer is fine, but that layer is out of commission"—after the several times cross-chain bridges were hacked, I’ve directly shifted "convenience" from a bonus to a penalty.

And those abnormal price feeds from oracles, everyone suddenly collectively enters a "wait for confirmation" mode—it's quite realistic: with more modules, there are more objects to confirm, and psychologically, people become more cautious. Not long ago, I was following a bunch of "modular narrative" accounts, but then I realized that besides shouting about ecosystems and pie-in-the-sky plans, there are few who clearly explain which types of risks they are actually bearing... Forget it, I unfollowed half, and kept a few who really know how to do the math.