Recently, everyone has been arguing about modular blockchains. Honestly, what has really changed for end users? I feel the most straightforward difference isn't "narrative upgrade," but rather the small user experience improvements: confirmation isn't so laggy, failures aren't so frequent, and crossing over between chains doesn't make me re-learn a new wallet and bridge every time. Others think that once modularity is implemented, everyone will instantly have low fees, instant transactions, and world peace; in reality, you still have to deal with various rollups, bridges, and message delays. The underlying separation just makes some aspects easier to optimize, provided the team executes correctly. By the way, during the extreme periods of funding rates, while the community was guessing reversals and shouting to keep pumping the bubble, I was only paying attention to transaction completion, slippage, and matching delays... Anyway, I care more about whether I can get the expected transaction when I click "submit," and the rest is just background noise. That's it for tonight, just recording before bed.