Recently, looking at DAO voting feels a bit like flipping through an album: on the surface, everyone talks about "community consensus," but upon closer reading of the proposals, how incentives are distributed, who gets them first, how voting power is weighted... the power structure is basically written between the lines. Especially the kind of "those who do the work get more rewards" sounds quite right, but when you look at the execution path, in the end, it's still the people closest to the funding pool who have it easiest.

I'm also observing the inflation + studio + token price spiral in the blockchain game space. It feels like what's collapsing isn't the gameplay, but the incentives skewed, and everyone is left only calculating the accounts. Anyway, my current habit of staying calm is: first, don't look at the "vision" in proposals; instead, outline the incentive table, timeline, and who can modify parameters, then vote the next day... no rush to be a passionate spectator.