Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Recently, I've seen discussions about modularization and the DA layer again, and developers are quite excited. There are a bunch of people sharing diagrams and papers in the group. Honestly, as a user, I’m a bit confused... In the end, it all comes back to the old question: is the project reliable?
When I look at "credibility," I first check three simple things that even beginners can do: on GitHub, I don’t expect you to read the code, at least see if it’s maintained long-term, not just uploading all files once and then nothing; for audit reports, don’t just look for "pass," focus on whether there are high-risk items, whether they "fixed" issues or just "accepted the risk," and who the auditor is; upgrading multi-signature is even more critical—who can sign, how many people can modify the protocol, whether there’s a timelock (giving you reaction time). These are more practical than just talking about it. Anyway, I’d rather be slow, wait until emotions settle and information is complete before jumping in.