Lately, when I see projects, I wonder if they are seriously working on things. I instead focus on how the treasury is spending: where the money is going, whether there are corresponding milestones after spending, and not just muddle through with the words "ecosystem development" all day. I'm most afraid of those small amounts being transferred one by one, looking very diligent, but actually just distracting attention; or contract upgrades being hyped up with fancy words, while the treasury keeps extending the "consultant fee."

When cross-chain bridge issues happened again, a bunch of people in the group asked me what I think. I really don’t bother explaining anymore… Anyway, I just look at whether they stop, rollback, or clearly explain where the money flows in the announcement after they have problems, or if they just shift blame. And those abnormal price quotes from oracles—when everyone is "waiting for confirmation" to form consensus—can’t the risk control switch be written into the milestones? Do it before talking, don’t just rely on words. That’s all for now, I’ll keep on duty watching.