As for modular chains, frankly, for someone like me, a end-user, the most obvious change isn't "more advanced," but rather that the same amount of money in my wallet gets split into several places: bridges, L2, various settlement layers... it becomes more fragmented in usage, but sometimes it actually feels smoother, with fewer lags. Whether the experience is good or not ultimately depends on whether the liquidity is real. I now treat those thick order books with instant cancellations as noise.

Recently, some people have been complaining that on-chain data tools and tagging systems are lagging or can be misleading, and I agree: looking at dashboards isn't as good as looking at "signals." The only signal I care about is whether, after a trade, the depth can hold up, and whether the order cancellation rhythm might suddenly change. No matter how modular the system is assembled like Lego, what truly changes for users might just be being more easily fooled by the illusion of "high liquidity"... Anyway, I’d rather be slower than be misled by fake liquidity education.