I just took a walk by the beach and brushed up on the weekly report, then I saw someone arguing about MEV.


Basically, it's like someone can "cut in line" on the blockchain too—you think your transaction is in order, but someone who’s better at queuing pushes you aside.
The biggest impact isn’t really from those big whales shouting "fairness," but more from ordinary people: small swaps with more slippage, missing out on minting by a step, getting squeezed during liquidation, the experience is really bad.

Recently, on-chain data tools and tagging systems have also been criticized for being laggy or even misleading, and I can relate: you look at "this address is xx" and make a judgment, but it might be a story from yesterday…
Anyway, I’m not too superstitious about single tags now; I prefer to look at transaction behavior and timelines—slower but more reassuring.

There’s really too much information, and my filtering method is pretty crude: I only focus on two or three teams or proposal updates that have been active for a long time, the rest of the debates are just like the sea breeze—listen if you can, ignore if you don’t understand.
The word "fairness" is big, but at least don’t make ordinary people feel like every confirmation click is like a lottery.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments