I've been lurking in the group for a long time, and today I can't help but speak up: When it comes to DAO voting, don't just look at the lines that say "for the betterment of the community." The most genuine parts of proposals are often the small details about how incentives are distributed, who can get them first, and who has one vote that counts as ten... Basically, it's the power structure written between the lines. Recently, that mainstream public chain is about to upgrade/maintain, and the group is guessing whether the ecosystem will move. I see many projects claim to be neutral, but as soon as a proposal comes out, they immediately arrange various subsidies, migration rewards, and voting power bonuses—pretty honest. Anyway, now when I see "vote pass, then distribute," I reflexively want to cut losses... No, I mean I want to check my wallet permissions first, to avoid emotional impulsiveness from digging my own hole. That's all for now.