Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just saw a news story that well summarizes the chaos in state management of cryptocurrencies. South Korea is urgently revising its custody protocols after the National Tax Service accidentally leaked a wallet recovery phrase. Yes, you read that right — a government agency published the access key to a confiscated wallet.
The result? About 4 million PRTG tokens were moved immediately after the leak, with a theoretical value of around $4.8 million. Someone gained access and, interestingly, returned the assets the next day — at least that’s what the police are investigating. But the fact is that security completely failed.
And this is not an isolated case. Since the beginning of the year, there have been reports of seized cryptocurrencies going missing. 22 bitcoins disappeared from a safe in a Gangnam police station. Losses have also been recorded in prosecutors’ offices. It’s kind of a pattern indeed.
The finance minister promised inspections and new security measures, but without detailing exactly what will be done or when. It’s hard to trust state custody of digital assets when you see this history. The question is: incompetence or negligence?