Last night before bed, I was going through another protocol’s GitHub and audit report, and the more I read, the more it felt like playing “Spot the Difference”… I’m going to set myself a beginner-style credibility check: first, see whether the code is maintained by someone over the long term (not that it suddenly gets a bunch of commits and then disappears), and then check whether the audit report clearly spells out the scope and known risks—don’t just focus on “passed/high score.”

Upgrading multi-signature is even more serious; basically, it comes down to “who can change the rules.” I’ll dig into whether the signers are just a bunch of aliases, whether the threshold is too casual, and it’s best to have some buffer like delays or public proposals.

Recently, social mining and fan tokens have been getting hyped again with “attention is mining,” and I’m honestly a bit worried: attention comes fast and goes just as quickly, and in the end, it might still just be a few multi-signature people deciding whether the value you mined actually counts… Forget it—I’ll keep mapping out the path. Tomorrow, I’ll probably get hit in the face by some new gimmick.