Lately, looking at DAO proposals has been a bit frustrating, on the surface they say "optimize incentives" "increase participation," but only at the end do you realize the key is to shift voting power toward a few addresses, or to reward only those who can run scripts... Honestly, it's not about discussing directions, but about rearranging who has the say. What's more awkward is that some proposals casually mention "compliance/privacy," which, combined with the recent heated debates in the group about whether privacy coins or mixing coins cross the line, has directly torn apart everyone's stances. Anyway, now I look at where the money comes from and where the votes go before voting; small test on-chain operations are safer than blindly following. As for whether this kind of structure will gradually drive people away... what do you all think.