I just reviewed a DAO voting proposal, and the more I look at it, the more it seems like a rehearsal for "who takes the keys, who distributes the tokens"... On the surface, it claims to increase participation, but upon closer inspection, the incentives all flow to the same addresses, and the power structure is easily solidified. To put it plainly, you're voting on the rules, not slogans. Recently, developers are excited about modularization and the DAO layer, while ordinary users are confused. I'm about the same: no matter how new the terminology is, in the end, it still comes down to who can change parameters and who can decide the budget. Before I vote now, I first look at the allocation table and execution permissions—don't be lulled to sleep by the words "community consensus." That's how I approach it for now.