Lately, I’ve been looking at a few governance votes, and it feels rather mysterious: on the surface, everyone can vote, but when it comes to the key proposals, the same big holders just keep circling back and switching positions. Delegated voting was originally meant to save time, but somehow, “saving time” ends up bundling decision-making power into the hands of a small number of people—so, honestly, governance tokens are really governing who? I’m also a bit confused. What’s even stranger is that once airdrop season kicks in, task platforms use anti–Sybil/anti-witch-hunting measures, and the point system pushes people to clock in like at work. They’re busy doing tasks to rack up points—so who would have time to read proposals? Anyway, I’m in “small cabin mode” now: watch the market less. If I can understand the vote, I’ll cast one; if I can’t, I won’t delegate. I’d rather be slower than hand myself over.