Recently, I've been looking at LST and re-staking again, everyone is focused on "an extra layer of yield," but honestly, the money doesn't just appear out of thin air: part of it comes from the basic output of verification/staking, and the other part is more like "selling insurance"—lending out your security and liquidity in exchange for fees/incentives. It sounds pretty good, but the risks stack up: if the smart contract glitches, redemption queues, de-pegging, or rules around re-staking change, the yields don't increase much, and the complexity skyrockets. Modularization and DA narratives are really popular among developers right now, but users are often confused—I myself am often confused... The more this happens, the more I have to ask: who is actually paying for these yields?


What I fear most isn't losing money, but losing control—it's when the chain is too long, and when something goes wrong, I don't even know which button to press. Anyway, I’d rather earn a little less than leave a clear path to exit.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments