Just finished practicing yoga, and after my heartbeat calmed down, I went back to checking the on-chain activity. Suddenly, the whole idea of an AI Agent felt very much like “autonomous driving”: it can drive, but if something really goes wrong, a person still has to hold the steering wheel. For example, it can help me watch prices, do batch transactions, and automatically sign and execute—but in the very second before signing, I still have to confirm for myself: whether the address is correct, whether the authorization was granted again with an unlimited allowance, whether the Gas is outrageous, and whether the route somehow ended up in a weird pool. Recently, around the time of the upgrade/maintenance of that mainstream public chain, people in the group have been speculating whether the project will migrate. But I actually want to dial the automation down a bit instead: if the chain hiccups, the robot keeps running; in the end, though, it’s still me who gets blamed. To put it plainly, an Agent can be diligent for me, but it can’t be responsible for me.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin