Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I recently noticed an interesting legal development: a well-known cryptocurrency exchange founder filed a new trial petition in the Federal Court of New York. The former CEO argued that the testimony of witnesses who did not appear at the original trial could change the court’s understanding of the financial situation of the exchange before its collapse. The petition was submitted in February and was represented by his mother. Legal observers have described this move as a low-probability attempt to win.
The background is that this founder has been convicted on seven counts of embezzling customer funds and sentenced to 25 years. Now his team is seeking a new breakthrough, claiming that the testimonies of former executives Daniel Chapsky and Ryan Salame should have been presented at the original trial, which could reshape the understanding of FTX and its affiliated entity Alameda Research’s financial condition. Particularly, Ryan Salame has already pleaded guilty and is serving a 7.5-year sentence, adding more complexity to the situation.
Even more interesting, the defense team has requested to replace the presiding judge, claiming that Judge Lewis Kaplan exhibited “clear bias” during the proceedings. They argue that the judge restricted certain defense arguments regarding the availability of investor funds, which influenced the jury’s judgment.
From a market perspective, this case involves the ongoing bankruptcy liquidation of FTX, which is valued at around $7 billion. By 2025, billions of dollars have already been distributed to creditors, with more payments expected. Although this legal move has a low chance of success, it keeps the event in the public eye. The crypto industry is still digesting the impact of FTX’s collapse, and every development in this case can influence investor confidence in industry governance and fund security.
It’s worth noting that even if the new trial petition is ultimately rejected, it sends a signal: in complex crypto financial cases, legal proceedings can last for years. For those monitoring FTX-related assets and creditor payout progress, this means the recovery process could take longer than expected.