Recently, news of the resignation of Caitlin Kalinovskyi, head of OpenAI’s robotics team, has caused a stir in the market. She expressed serious ethical concerns about the AI collaboration agreement with the Pentagon, and this matter is not just a personal decision, but a question of principle.

Kalinovskyi says that AI can play an important role in national security, but that it requires proper oversight and security measures. Her main concerns are the misuse of AI for domestic surveillance and the development of autonomous weapon systems. She said that OpenAI did not establish sufficient administrative safeguards before announcing this agreement, and that the decision was made in too much of a rush.

Kalinovskyi joined Meta in 2024, where she worked on an AR glasses project. Her arrival at OpenAI was meant to give the team a new direction, but the situation changed after the announcement of the Pentagon collaboration. She has maintained her respect for Sam Altman and the entire team, but she has not compromised on this issue.

An OpenAI spokesperson said that the collaboration with the Pentagon is an effort to strengthen national security by using AI in a restrained manner, and that the company has set clear boundaries. However, controversy over this collaboration continues in the industry. The market reaction has been extremely interesting—after the news, the number of ChatGPT deletions increased by more than 295%, while Anthropic’s Claude app topped the list of free apps on the U.S. App Store.

This entire matter raises a major question about the ethical use of AI and autonomous systems, such as dbot technology like (. When big companies work with governments, how important is it to have transparency and security measures? If you’re also thinking about such technological development and its ethical aspects, following discussions on Gate is a great option.