In the past couple of days, the group has been sharing screenshots about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and those “de-peg fast, run away” messages... Seeing too many of these really causes anxiety, but I’ll now take a break first to see if the project is actually reliable. I don’t want to be led solely by emotions.

For a newbie reading “credibility,” I think three points are enough: Don’t just look at whether there’s a repository on GitHub, mainly check if someone is maintaining it consistently and if the changes are reasonable; don’t treat the audit report as a talisman, focus on whether issues have been fixed, whether the fixes are complete, and who is following up; multi-signature upgrades are more practical—can rules be changed arbitrarily, how many people hold the keys, and whether there are delays or public processes. A life analogy is: choosing a restaurant, not only look at the facade (narrative), but also whether there are people in the kitchen, if health inspections have been addressed, and whether the cashier password is controlled solely by the owner... Anyway, I use this simple method to screen, and it makes me feel a bit more at ease.