I tried once, using a new wallet to take a more "privacy-focused" route, thinking that on-chain transparency wouldn't be so obvious... But after two steps, I realized that if someone really wanted to trace it, they could still connect the dots, and the exchange wouldn't be short of the required materials. To put it plainly, ordinary users' expectations of privacy shouldn't be too idealistic: it's more about "being less watched by strangers," not "completely disappearing." And the compliance line is quite realistic too; the more you spend, the easier it is to attract risk control attention, and in the end, you still have to explain the source of funds, which makes you nervous and hesitant. Recently, cross-chain bridges have been hacked again, and oracle price feeds have been acting up. Everyone is huddling in that "waiting for confirmation" phase. I can only admit: in the on-chain world, it's often not the most technically advanced that wins, but whoever can endure until certainty. Anyway, I now have two rules: don't touch unknown bridges, and if there's a simple way to do things, don't take the long route. Better to go slow than to risk becoming a sample.