Walking along the beach at night, I came across someone arguing about whether mandatory royalties should be enforced in the secondary market. Honestly, everyone wants "creators to be respected," but when it comes to transactions, everyone hopes for as little friction as possible—that's quite realistic. If enforced, liquidity might flow away; if not enforced, creators feel like they're being left out. Anyway, it now seems more like using trading rules to patch the gaps in community consensus.

By the way, I saw that the testnet incentives and points system are heating up again, and people in the group are guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens... It’s a bit like: treating "possible airdrops" as royalties, then discussing how much creators should get. Slightly sarcastic but understandable—everyone is looking for certainty.

Personally, I still prefer to see projects tie income and contributions at the protocol level, rather than relying entirely on market self-regulation. Taking it slow is fine, as long as it doesn’t turn creation into another score-boosting game.