Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Nothing’s wrong, nothing’s wrong!
Analysis: Bitcoin’s “quantum threat” is controllable; potential $145 billion in sell pressure or non-systemic risk
Data shows that about 1.7 million BTC (about $145 billion) are stored in early “Satoshi era” addresses. If the private keys are compromised, it could create potential sell pressure. But from a market liquidity perspective, this amount is not unmanageable: in a bull market, the average daily amount sold by long-term holders is typically between 10,000 and 30,000 BTC. This means the above scale is equivalent to 2 to 3 months of normal profit-taking.
In addition, the exchange average monthly inflow is about 850,000 BTC, and the nominal trading volume in the derivatives market can cover this size in just a few days. Historical data shows that in the most recent bear market, more than 2.3 million BTC changed hands in a single quarter—far exceeding the potential scale of the “quantum risk”—yet it did not trigger a systemic collapse.
Analysis suggests that even if assets are released in a concentrated manner, it would be more likely to result in period-by-period volatility rather than a structural shock. At the same time, entities capable of acquiring the relevant assets are more likely to adopt strategies such as selling in batches and hedging to reduce market impact.
Overall, the core issue of the “quantum threat” may not be the sell pressure itself, but rather how governance responds—for example, whether to limit the liquidity of assets in related addresses through protocol upgrades. $BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)