Recently, I've been watching everyone argue about who has higher L2 TPS, lower fees, and more aggressive subsidies, and I find it a bit surreal... Frankly, the "on-chain data" you see is often the version provided by the node/RPC/indexer you use, not an omniscient perspective. RPC congestion, rate limiting, indexers falling behind, or different service providers rolling back at different paces—while you're still seeing "confirmed," others might have already switched to a different set of historical data. Especially when it comes to stablecoins, don’t just look at transaction hashes to comfort yourself; collateral and liquidity exits haven't changed, but community rhetoric can change rapidly. Anyway, now I just take screenshots of anomalies as a makeshift method, so that later reconciliation isn't entirely based on memory... I also don’t hold a full position; the latest information tends to deceive those who are heavily invested.