Lately, the more I look at on-chain data, the more I feel that "privacy" is a bit of a mystic concept... To put it simply, most of the time it's not about whether you're anonymous or not, but whether you're willing to be linked together with a single click. Using the same address to claim airdrops, deposit and withdraw on exchanges, and then playing a few more applications is basically like putting a sign on your forehead with clues. Compliance isn't black and white either; it's more like a moving line: you might think you're just using normally, but others might see it as a "suspicious pattern." For ordinary users, I think it's better to lower expectations: on-chain data is publicly accessible by default, and privacy tools aren't some invisibility cloak—at best, they just raise the cost a bit.



And then there's that recent trend of social mining and fan tokens, claiming "attention is mining." It sounds exciting, but as I scroll through, I start feeling guilty: are we really mining, or are we just packaging and selling our behavioral data for a good price? Anyway, I'm more concerned about not linking my main wallet everywhere. For now, I'll split my frequently used addresses and revoke permissions one by one.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin