Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
DeepSeek V4 scores a perfect 120 on Putnam 2025, with formal mathematical reasoning on par with Axiom
According to Beating Monitoring, DeepSeek V4 has announced two sets of formal mathematical reasoning evaluations. The Putnam (Putnam Competition) is the highest-level undergraduate mathematics competition in North America.
In practical scenarios, V4-Flash-Max scored 81.00 points on the Putnam-200 Pass@8 benchmark, using open-source tools LeanExplore and limited sampling. In comparison, Seed-2.0-Prover scored 35.50, Gemini 3 Pro and Seed-1.5-Prover both scored 26.50.
In frontier scenarios, V4 adopts a hybrid formal-informal reasoning approach, first generating candidate natural language solutions with informal reasoning, then filtering through self-verification, and finally completing rigorous proofs in Lean with a formal agent. V4 achieved a perfect score of 120/120 on Putnam-2025, tying for first place with Axiom, surpassing Seed-1.5-Prover’s 110/120 and Aristotle’s 100/120. Frontier scenarios utilize large-scale computational expansion, while practical scenario results better reflect routine deployment capabilities.