Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw people arguing about secondary royalties. Put simply, it’s this: creators want sustainability, and traders just want cheaper friction. You can stand anywhere, but don’t dress it up like it’s a moral question—at the end of the day, it still comes down to whose contract permissions are stronger, and which platform routes traffic to whom.
In the past couple of days, I’ve been watching the capital flow paths of a few new launches. No matter how nice the royalty wording sounds, once it’s unlocked, it still gets smashed. And the repeated talk about the unlock calendar isn’t without reason either… Things like anxiety about selling pressure don’t disappear just by slogans.
Anyway, when I look at the creator economy now, I first check: are royalties “voluntary” or “mandatory”? If they’re mandatory, is there a backdoor to change it? Then I check whether the revenue-sharing address is clean. Just now, I casually placed a small order with 12 USDT to dip my toe in the water—it feels more like testing human nature than supporting art. That’s all for now.