The third time voting on a DAO proposal, the more I look at it, the more I feel that it's not about "whether to do it" but about "who gets the steering wheel." Some proposals seem to be about issuing subsidies or creating incentives on the surface, but upon closer inspection, they are just consolidating voting power into a few addresses or embedding execution authority into a small committee. In other words, the power structure is already set, and everything else is just process.

Recently, everyone has been discussing modularization and the DAO layer, and developers are excitedly enthusiastic, while users are confused: why am I even voting? Anyway, when I look at proposals now, I first check three things: where the money comes from, who distributes it, and who takes responsibility if something goes wrong. Confusion is normal; for now, the signposts are just here.