Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen new L1/L2 incentives to boost TVL again, with old users rushing in while complaining, "Mining, selling..." Basically, what everyone is betting on isn't the returns, but the trust chain of that cross-chain that you simply don't have time to verify one by one. A transfer from A to B, whether called IBC or a bridge, fundamentally requires trust: the source chain won't rollback, the target chain won't malfunction, the light client/relay won't cheat, the verification logic won't be written incorrectly, plus all those price feeds/ordering/multisig keys shouldn't be stolen. No matter how good the parameters look, if there's a hiccup in message passing, the impermanent loss for LPs is still considered small.
What I fear missing the most isn't actually the opportunity, but rather not clarifying the question of "Who am I actually trusting?" before a project encounters issues.