Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Lately, watching AI agents run on-chain interactions, it feels like "autonomous driving + manual takeover at any time"... I'm tired but still watching. To put it simply, most automated tasks are mechanical: checking balances, price comparison, routing splitting, slippage calculation, and even batch trading based on strategies; but when something really goes wrong, humans still need to cover the safety net.
Several steps that must be monitored by humans: 1) Permissions/authorizations, especially unlimited ones—no matter how smart the agent is, it can still be tricked into making mistakes; 2) Contract interaction targets—address or proxy contract shell swaps are very common; 3) Parameter boundaries—slippage, deadline, gas limits—if not set properly, it’s like "automatically sending money away"; 4) Exception handling—getting stuck, rolling back, MEV sandwiching—strategies need to be able to stop.
Recently, social mining and fan tokens—those "attention is mining" schemes—are quite similar: agents can help you scrape data, run tasks, but whether it’s a valid concept or not, you still need to think clearly about what you want. Otherwise, attention becomes the one being mined. Anyway, I’ve gotten used to this approach: the agent handles execution, I only keep the final confirmation and emergency stop. Let’s start with that.