Lately I've been looking at governance voting again, and the more I look, the more uncomfortable I feel: a bunch of people delegate their votes, claiming it's to save trouble, but in the end, it's always those few big players/institutions making the decisions... Who exactly are governance tokens governing? It feels like "I invest, you hold the meetings." I say I don't care publicly, but I still check the proposal progress, afraid of missing out on incentive changes, afraid of dilution—classic FOMO. Especially now, with staking unlocks and unlock schedules being discussed daily, the selling pressure anxiety kicks in, and I just want to find someone "who can vote the right way for me" to latch onto. Anyway, it's quite contradictory: I don't want oligarchic control, but I'm too lazy to watch every day myself. Sigh.