Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Interesting how Durov once again points out an important issue. The age verification app planned by the EU is supposed to be privacy-friendly, but the Telegram founder has serious concerns. He publicly revealed that the app was hacked just minutes after launch — indicating fundamental security flaws.
What particularly catches my attention here: this so-called privacy app could ultimately be misused as a surveillance tool. That’s exactly the problem many developers and privacy activists have been discussing for a long time. The flaws in such systems often only become visible when tested in practice.
Durov’s criticism hits a sore spot. Digital identity systems are complex, and if not built properly, they create massive security vulnerabilities. This isn’t just about technical shortcomings but also the fundamental question: who really controls this data? The debate over privacy versus government control becomes increasingly relevant through such cases. It’s important that people like Durov expose these vulnerabilities publicly instead of ignoring them.