Shorting the index ⭐️⭐️: $OPG


This wave dropped from 0.52 to 0.33, and the core issue isn't the 36% single-day decline, but the fact that the top ten addresses hold 92.63% of the circulating supply—market fluctuations are entirely determined by these ten addresses, with retail chips accounting for less than 8%, giving them no pricing power.

Currently, only 40 million tokens are unlocked from the circulating supply, with 360 million tokens still locked and awaiting release. Even if only 1.5% of the total supply is unlocked on May 21, it will expand the circulating supply by 15%. From the opening rally, all upward movements are to find buyers for locked chips.

On-chain data shows that during the 15-minute surge to 0.5239, the top three addresses transferred nearly 8 million tokens, with a holding cost below $0.05. Now, they are breaking into small orders to buy the dip and distribute tokens. The more the holdings decrease, the more retail investors pile in, not with increasing volume, but by getting trapped and adding to their longs. Large investors use small long orders to influence sentiment, while big short positions are already lurking. About 60% of retail longs have a cost basis above 0.4; a 5-point drop will trigger a chain of forced liquidations.

In the short term, the price is likely to fluctuate between 0.32 and 0.36, possibly even rally to 0.4 to create a false rebound. Once the chips are distributed, the price will break below the previous low of 0.3056, triggering forced liquidations and a stampede, reaching the 0.2 range within three days. As the unlock window approaches, the price may dip below 0.1, ultimately falling back to the 0.05 cost basis.

This is fundamentally a highly controlled chip game. At this moment, bottom-fishing is essentially providing a buyer for massive chips—seeming like a bargain, but actually accepting the flying knives aimed at oneself.
OPG-12.69%
View Original
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
只屯大饼
· 5h ago
The market maker distributes chips at high-price levels. If no one buys, he takes them himself, pulling the order book upward continuously. If someone does pick up the chips, he keeps distributing them until no one is willing to take them anymore. When the buyers at the top start cutting their losses, the market maker buys back the chips he directly sold—at the lowest price. As for exactly when this happens, we retail investors don’t know; as for whether anyone is actually buying, we also don’t know. Only the market maker knows.
View OriginalReply0
TheFallenGeniusTraderZhao
· 5h ago
Get in quickly!🚗
View OriginalReply0
DongmuNaCai
· 5h ago
The words they say are all over the place—at one moment the chips are being controlled by others, and then they say they’re looking for someone to take the bag. At one point they claim volume is increasing, and then again they claim volume isn’t increasing—and in both cases it’s being controlled by others. We can’t get the chips. What an idiot.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-321ff74c
· 5h ago
The project team lacks vision.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-321ff74c
· 6h ago
Cool down
View OriginalReply0
DamnIt
· 6h ago
Get in quickly!🚗
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin