I doubt whether the project team is working seriously; I really don't trust those PPT slides with "grand roadmaps." Instead, I prefer to look into government treasury expenditures and whether milestones match up: where the money is spent, how it's spent, and whether there are deliverables at each stage. To put it simply, don't just look at whether they can tell a good story; you need to see if there are verifiable results after each funding round. Otherwise, the treasury becomes a bottomless pit, and everything ends up as vague terms like "ecosystem development" or "market cooperation."

Recently, hardware wallets are out of stock again, and phishing links are everywhere—so many people in the group are scrambling to ask about security at the last minute. What I care more about is whether the project team takes permissions, multi-signature, and budget risk control seriously, or if they just treat users as cash cows and leave you to be careful yourself. For me, it’s actually more serious when they lower their goals and focus on solidifying one or two milestones first—that feels more like they’re genuinely working on it. I do the same myself: lowering the goals helps me stick with it longer.