These days, watching large transfers again, I see the familiar storyline: claiming privacy needs freedom, yet fearing "greetings" from exchanges. To put it plainly, ordinary users' expectations for on-chain privacy shouldn't be too romantic—on-chain is transparent by default, and privacy is more like "pulling the curtains," not moving the house; if compliance checks happen, the timeline, linked addresses, and deposit/withdrawal points are all there.



The new L1/L2s are starting to offer incentives to boost TVL, and I understand the old users' complaints of "mining, harvesting, and selling": you think you're just farming, but on-chain, it’s like you're tagging yourself. When the wind shifts one day, these diligent wallets will be the first to be traced. My approach is quite cautious: split funds into smaller amounts, keep the paths simple, avoid using mysterious "privacy" tools, and leave some explainability—it's more practical than pretending to be mysterious… Let's see what happens next.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin