Today I keep seeing people say those on-chain “coincidental transfers” are definitely insider moves. To be honest, I’d rather split the route first and look at it piece by piece: which entry point it came in through, which aggregator it went through, whether it detoured to perform a seemingly unnecessary token swap/authorization, and finally which contract endpoint it landed on. A lot of the time it’s not some mysterious organization—it’s the router doing its best to minimize slippage, and casually routing you into the same pool. Lately, though, everyone’s been mocking and complaining that validators are making money too comfortably, and that MEV ordering isn’t fair. I think some of these “coincidences” really do look like they’ve been squeezed in: within the same block, back-to-back, with the amounts timed just right. Anyway, when I see something abnormal now, I don’t rush to blame it—I first straighten out the transaction tree. If I can explain half the emotions, I’ll have half the frustration.