Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just woke up and checked the blockchain, saw someone complaining again about MEV front-running being unfair. To put it simply, the biggest affected group is still small investors: you place a swap expecting it to be processed in order, but instead you're squeezed, slippage hits hard, and the money ends up as a "queue fee." Market makers and scavenging bots obviously say it's about efficiency and price discovery... fine, anyway, the costs are ultimately borne by the most emotionally unstable group.
Recently, the testnet incentives seem pretty similar: everyone rushes for points, guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens, essentially betting on "who can squeeze into the queue first." Do you say on-chain ordering can be completely fair? I don't know, it feels like as long as block producers can still pick transactions, fairness will always be just a word written into proposals. That's all for now.