Last night, I was scrolling through on-chain data until my eyes hurt, and I found that "a certain address just moved," but the neighboring group had already argued about it for a round... It was a bit embarrassing. Later, I thought about it and didn't blame anyone; if any of the steps like node synchronization, RPC caching, or indexer queuing get a little stuck, what you see on the chain is like a late-arriving bullet screen: not fake, just a half-beat late, especially during peak times, it's more obvious.

So now I’m quite cautious about the conclusion that "on-chain anomalies = immediate buy/ride." To put it simply, you're judging the data pipeline, not an omniscient perspective; when the funding rate hits an extreme, everyone is shouting about reversals or continuing to squeeze the bubble, but the "on-chain evidence" you get might already have been delayed and restructured through some processing. I try to compare multiple RPCs/browser views, and for important data, I wait for a confirmation number—better to be slow and avoid being led by false urgency.