Recently looked at a few DAO proposals, on the surface they say "optimize incentives" and "increase participation," but after carefully reviewing the attachments and parameters, it feels more like rearranging seats: who gets the budget, whose votes are more effective, who passively acts as a backup. To put it simply, voting isn't about right or wrong; it's about confirming the power structure. Incentives are just to make everyone willing to click the confirm button. Coincidentally, that main public chain is about to upgrade/maintain, and people in the group are speculating whether the project will migrate. I think whether it migrates or not isn't just about technology; it's more about who can continue to control the treasury and discourse in the new territory. Anyway, I won't make a firm stance for now. Tonight, I'll review the delegation relationships and treasury flows again. That's all for now.