I often have to remind myself: don't get carried away just by "interest stacking." Recently, when debates about nested staking/sharing security erupt again, it further emphasizes the need to first assess whether the underlying system is reliable.

For beginners, I think there are three key things to consider regarding credibility: Don't just look at stars on GitHub, check if there have been continuous updates recently, whether issues are being taken seriously with people proposing questions and others fixing them; don't just screenshot the conclusion of an audit report, focus on what scope was covered, whether there are "modules not covered," and whether high-risk issues were ultimately addressed; upgrading multi-signature setups is more practical—who can sign, what are the thresholds, and can it be paused urgently—these are more effective than slogans.

Anyway, when I see claims like "upgrades are fast" or "higher yields," my first reaction isn't excitement but to ask: who’s taking the blame, and how are they taking it? If I still feel uncertain after looking into it, I won't touch it—that's pretty normal.